Japan

Beyond the Self: How “We Thinking" is Cultivated in Japan

BY SHINRI FURUZAWA

In individualist cultures such as the USA, “I” thinking often prevails. Values such as autonomy and independence, personal goals, and individual achievement are important. Recently, however, this emphasis on the individual and decline in the importance of community are recognized as problematic, as pointed out—for example—by Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. In collectivist cultures, interdependence and group harmony are important values and “we” thinking is more predominant. What are the mechanisms for how these different ways of thinking are imparted to young children? In this blog post, we explore the example of Japan.

How “we” values are encouraged in school

The importance of responsibility to the group, empathy for others, and group harmony is reflected and reinforced through Japanese education. The dynamics of this are explored in a recent documentary, Instruments of a Beating Heart.

Director, Emma Ryan Yamazaki, filmed a group of first-grade students at a Tokyo elementary school, focusing on the experiences of Ayame, a young girl who is perhaps a little more sensitive and requires more attention than her peers. The film’s dramatic arc follows the students as they form a school orchestra to play “Ode to Joy” at a school event. Both auditions and rehearsals are lessons in resilience. Students get only one audition attempt on an instrument. Ayame first tries out to play the drum, but fails and cries quietly at her desk. She succeeds in her next audition on the cymbal but struggles during the rigorous rehearsals. On one occasion, she is strictly reprimanded to the point of tears, making her too afraid to attend the next rehearsal. She has to be coaxed back by her class teacher. The students finally give their performance successfully and the music teacher praises them saying, “You’ve made us proud.”

Stepping back, we first see how empathy is valued as during the auditions all students are expected to cheer and be happy for those who were successful… but also be considerate to those who were not chosen. The music teacher tells them from the beginning that the most important lessons they should learn are perseverance and the joy of being useful to others. He also stresses the goal of group harmony telling students, “Make your hearts as one.” We see that good work ethic is vital as students are expected to practice diligently at home, and are praised when they choose to practice together outside rehearsal. The orchestra is a distillation of an interdependent society in which the success of the whole depends on the contribution of each individual. Ayame and her friends talk about the great pressure they feel, a pressure to succeed for themselves but also not to let down their classmates.

Japanese students cleaning their classroom

The film reveals how values such as empathy, group harmony, resilience, perseverance, and respect for authority, are instilled in children through the education system. This is reinforced not just in the classroom, but through daily routines. The film shows Ayame going about her normal responsibilities such as sweeping the classroom with her classmates, serving lunch, and greeting students at the school gate. Collective responsibilities begin young as schools usually do not have janitors; instead the students are responsible for taking care of their schools. These duties help children develop pride, responsibility and respect for the school, and the school community. There is a focus on collaboration, sharing responsibilities, and achieving group cohesion.

Of course, even in Japan, schools will differ from one another, but in general there are great differences between Western and East Asian acculturation. Professor Jin Li of Brown University argues that the purpose of education differs across cultural traditions.. Western cultures conceptualize learning as cultivating the mind and achieving insight; East Asian cultures conceptualize it as virtue-oriented, becoming a better person to achieve one’s potential in terms of Confucian ideals, such as harmony.

How “we” values are cultivated from birth: Communication style

In Japan, socialization to think of what’s best for the group over the individual actually begins long before school. There are differences in communication styles between mothers and children before language is even fully developed. Studies show that the Japanese train their children to be sensitive to the needs and desires of others to emphasize empathy; in the West, child-focused communication emphasizes individuality. While communication in the US is direct and explicit, Japanese communication style is indirect and implicit. For Japanese children, it is important to be a good listener and pay close attention to what others might mean implicitly. This contrasts with young American children who tend to ignore the speech of others in a society where being able to communicate effectively means being able to express oneself well. Japanese mothers also speak significantly less to their children than their Western counterparts, reflecting the virtue of silence. In a culture which values hierarchy and conformity, Japanese mothers also reinforce the hierarchical parent/child relationship, and the child's sense of belonging.

A surprising illustration of “we” thinking

Handmade leather randoseru weigh approx. 1.2 kg (2.6 pounds) and has 200 fittings.

With Japanese cultural values imparted from birth, children in Japan are remarkably sensitized to the feelings and desires of others. This is exemplified in an advertisement for backpacks known as randoseru. These backpacks have special cultural significance and almost all children are given one when they start elementary school, as explained in the New York Times article, “The book bag that binds Japanese society.” Randoseru are handmade from high quality leather and very expensive (between $100 to $500 USD).

The randoseru company described their ad as a documentary and it won the 2024 YouTube Works Award in the “Force for Good” category. It challenged the way parents think about their children. One reason for the ad’s success is the surprising reveals which provide drama. First, parents are interviewed and asked what kind of randoseru they would like their children to choose, or they think their children might choose. The parents are shown footage of their children as they enter a store and choose their randoseru. Mothers and fathers smile and watch with approval as their children carefully consider their choice of bag and choose styles and colors more or less as predicted. Viewers realize how well these parents know their children. The first surprise is then revealed.

The children had NOT been instructed to pick out the randoseru of their choice, rather they’d been asked to pick out the randoseru they thought their parents would want them to choose. We now understand the revelation was not how well the parents knew their children, but how well the children knew their parents. The children were then asked to re-enter the store and pick out the randoseru they really wanted. This reveals the second surprise.

In most cases, the children’s choices were different, even the complete opposite, from what their parents had predicted. In contrast to the carefully considered and thoughtful choices from the first round, the children run joyfully straight to their preferred bag. The parents are shocked and even tearful as they realize how mistaken they were about their children’s actual preferences.

Why were the parents not more aware of their own children’s wishes? This may be because the parents see themselves as guides who show how things should be done, for example choosing a bag color that won’t show the dirt. They also consider their children to be extensions of themselves and the family more than in the West. Children are closely linked or interconnected to their parents in terms of collective identity and social perception that parents encourage and instill. As children are a reflection of the parents’ efforts and values, parents are used to their children following and being attuned to their guidance as they have been trained.

The documentary has a happy ending. Reunited with their children in the store, parents let them know that they approve of their choices, including the father of a boy who chose a randoseru in pink. The documentary could be considered culturally subversive, as it showed the importance of respecting children as individuals and that children should not always be expected to consider the needs and wishes of others.

The importance of “I” within “we”

Encouraging empathy and sensitivity to the needs of others is one way to create social harmony and uphold collectivist values, however, it also leads to great pressure to conform. Conformity and suppression of the individual can lead to the impression that Japanese people are overly reserved or cautious. Individuals often feel they must suppress their true thoughts in order to avoid conflict because unanimity is valued, perhaps over-valued. The tension between what a Japanese person truly thinks and feels (known as “honne”) compared to what they feel obligated to support for the sake of harmony (“tatemae”), can lead to tremendous stress.

In Japan, constantly thinking of the thoughts and feelings of others and intuiting their wishes depends on a homogenous society that appreciates and conforms to the values of that society. But Japanese society is changing. As Japan reluctantly allows more immigration to meet the needs of a decreasing population, this trend will inevitably lead to some cultural challenges. The case of Japan may help other cultures reflect on what values they wish to instill in their young children and consider where the balance should lie between “I” and “we.”

We welcome your comments on your impression of the Japanese approach and how “I” and “we” values are instilled in your cultural context.


The Good Starts Project is generously funded by the Saul Zaentz Charitable Foundation.

I would like to thank Howard Gardner, Mara Krechevsky and Yvonne Liu-Constant for their valuable comments on an earlier draft.

 

REFERENCES

Clancy, P. M. (1987). The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In Language Socialization across Cultures (pp. 213–250). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620898.011

Fujita, N., & Hughes, C. (2021). Mind‐mindedness and self–other distinction: Contrasts between Japanese and British mothers’ speech samples. Social Development, 30(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12454

Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning : East and West (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

Can we learn from "Old Enough"—a TV show that sends young children out alone?

By Shinri Furuzawa

Audiences around the world have been charmed—but occasionally horrified—by the hit Netflix show, Old Enough. In this show from Japan, parents send children as young as two years old to complete various errands outside the home. These errands sometimes involve crossing busy traffic, walking distances of up to two miles, or taking a bus or ferry. The children, unbeknownst to them, carry hidden microphones which record their voiced thoughts. They are also trailed by a camera crew, disguised as passersby or workmen, to film them and ensure their safety.

In Japanese, the show translates to My First Errand

In every episode there is some dramatic tension as things inevitably go wrong. The children get scared; forget which items they are sent to buy; and/or can’t find what they’re looking for. A four-year-old girl in one episode takes so long completing her errand that the sun goes down and the production team has to light her way home. Presumably most members of the audience root for these very young children to complete their tasks successfully; indeed some viewers are moved to tears as the youngsters face and typically overcome various challenges.

Dangerous and irresponsible?

In the United States, a common reaction to the show is “That could never happen here, parents would be arrested!” It’s true that American police have been called on parents who allow their children out unaccompanied to play in the park, or walk the dog. Minority and low-income parents are particularly vulnerable to this intervention by the law. Fears about child safety, however, may well be  misplaced—the US is not a dangerous place for children, and abduction by a stranger, perhaps a parent’s greatest fear, is only 0.1% of FBI missing children cases.

That said, compared to many other developed societies, Japan is a safer country for children to roam. Urban planning means, for example, that residential streets are usually narrower with rare on-street parking. There are also fewer sidewalks. One might expect this geographical layout to be more dangerous, but actually in Japan cars are expected to watch out for and avoid pedestrians with the onus on drivers to be careful rather than the other way around. Mixed zoning also allows neighborhoods to include small businesses in residential areas—meaning children often don’t have far to go if they are sent to run errands. 

In comparison with the United States, which my colleagues and I consider to be a very egocentric (or “I-oriented”) society, Japan has a decidedly communal approach to childrearing. Indeed, “it takes a village,” with adults in the neighborhoods looking out for the local children. Contrary to expectation, Japanese cities can have closer communities than smaller towns as people live in greater proximity. Japanese parents are most likely to agree that they know people who would help their children if needed and this number rises in more urban communities.

The true goal of interdependence

Admirers of Old Enough see what these Japanese children are able to achieve; and many worry that children in their own countries don’t have enough autonomy or independence. But what Old Enough actually demonstrates is the Japanese value of interdependence. In this East Asian collectivist culture, the objective is not to achieve self-efficacy and achievement of personal goals. The aim is rather to nurture children to be responsive to the social needs and expectations of others while avoiding tension and conflict. Eminent social psychologists, Hazel Markus and Shinobu Kitayama, describe this as being “harmoniously connected to others.” The tasks assigned to children on Old Enough are tasks that will presumably help and benefit others—be it their family members or others in the community. The children are being asked to contribute and not just to benefit themselves. Sample errands include buying food for a sick sibling, picking up firewood for a cookout for friends and family, and delivering juice to thirsty fruit pickers. 

Boy aged 2 years 10 months, given candy before being sent on errand to dry cleaner (Originally broadcast by Fuji TV, 2017)

An example conveys this tension: In one episode, a two-year-old boy initially refuses to go out on his errand to pick up dry cleaning for his father, the owner of a sushi restaurant. His mother sternly tells him that his father will not be able to work if he doesn’t have his clean chef whites and they would have to close the restaurant if he can’t work. The responsibility of the family business is thus placed on the shoulders of the two-year-old son. Accordingly, for the benefit of his family, with a hug from his mother (and a treat in mouth), he sets off to the dry cleaner located about 60 yards away. He manages to do the errand and return home—though the dry-cleaning drags on the ground behind him as he is too small to lift it!

Children on the show generally feel a sense of duty to complete the tasks to help their family or community in some way. After successfully achieving their tasks, the children therefore feel proud of themselves and valued, they receive due praise and appreciation and are celebrated for their contribution. As an example, parents tell them that thanks to the groceries they brought home, dinner will taste more delicious.

The pattern I have described is not restricted to Japan. While visiting her family in Taiwan—an East Asian country with a similar collectivist culture to Japan—my colleague Yvonne Liu-Constant went to pick up her 3-year-old nephew, Joshua, from preschool. He was excited to see her (a cherished aunt visiting from America) and began running around everywhere. Suddenly, his teacher approached him and said something quietly. Joshua immediately went to his cubby and, to Yvonne’s surprise, returned with a well-organized backpack that he had neatly packed all by himself. Yvonne was impressed Joshua had managed this feat. His mother explained that all year, the children had been trained on how to organize their backpacks through step-by-step homework which built on skills to teach this responsibility. The reason? For children to be helpful to their parents. Increased independence and personal responsibility may be the result, but benefiting others is the supervening goal. 

AN Inspiring lesson

We may all have something to learn from this Japanese approach of encouraging children to think beyond themselves through errands or responsibilities which are acts of service. With proper guidance from caring adults and a supportive community, even very young children are capable of more than we might believe. Perhaps this Japanese TV show provides some insight on how we can all learn to think less about “me” and more about “we.”

The Good Starts Project is generously funded by the Saul Zaentz Charitable Foundation.

I’d like to thank Howard Gardner, Mara Krechevsky, and Yvonne Liu-Constant for their valuable comments on an earlier draft.